<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vidiated &#187; Revver</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vidiated.com/category/revver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vidiated.com</link>
	<description>Fascinated with Video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:47:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Monetizing Online UGV</title>
		<link>http://vidiated.com/2007/07/23/monetizing-online-ugv/</link>
		<comments>http://vidiated.com/2007/07/23/monetizing-online-ugv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flixya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metacafe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UGV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vidiated.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This ABC News article provides nice coverage of Revver and some of the other companies using an ad revenue sharing model in the user generated video space: http://www.abcnews.go.com/Technology/Story?id=3403460&#38;page=1 It is interesting to see this more democratic revenue model emerge in contrast to the traditional model where content creators had to first prove significant value before [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vidiated.com/2007/07/23/monetizing-online-ugv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not the Next YouTube</title>
		<link>http://vidiated.com/2007/07/09/not-the-next-youtube/</link>
		<comments>http://vidiated.com/2007/07/09/not-the-next-youtube/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 05:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Break.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DailyMotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metacafe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veoh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Metrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vidiated.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting research about second tier video sites. There is plenty of room in the online video marketplace. I just don&#8217;t think there is going to be another YouTube any time soon. http://www.centerformediaresearch.com/cfmr_brief.cfm?fnl=070706]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vidiated.com/2007/07/09/not-the-next-youtube/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.488 seconds -->

